GitHub-Mirror/Star64_linux
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git synced 2025-06-26 08:31:13 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Merge branch 'libnvdimm-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm

Browse source 
Pull libnvdimm fixes from Dan Williams:
 "A fix and regression test case for nvdimm namespace label
  compatibility.

  Details:

   - An "nvdimm namespace label" is metadata on an nvdimm that
     provisions dimm capacity into a "namespace" that can host a block
     device / dax-filesytem, or a device-dax character device.

     A namespace is an object that other operating environment and
     platform firmware needs to comprehend for capabilities like booting
     from an nvdimm.

     The label metadata contains a checksum that Linux was not
     calculating correctly leading to other environments rejecting the
     Linux label.

   These have received a build success notification from the kbuild
   robot, and a positive test result from Nick who reported the problem"

* 'libnvdimm-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm:
  nfit, libnvdimm: fix interleave set cookie calculation
  tools/testing/nvdimm: make iset cookie predictable
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2017-03-03 16:48:48 -08:00
commit 0b94da8dfc
6 changed files with 48 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
View file

@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_index = 4+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0];
memdev->region_offset = 1;
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 2;
@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 0+1;
memdev->region_index = 5+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->region_offset = (1 << 8);
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 2;
@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 4+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1];
memdev->region_offset = (1 << 16);
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 5+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = (1 << 24);
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 6+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 32);
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 1+1;
memdev->region_index = 7+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4;
memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 40);
memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
memdev->range_index = 11+1;
memdev->region_index = 9+1;
memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE;
memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2];
memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 48);
memdev->address = 0;
memdev->interleave_index = 0;
memdev->interleave_ways = 1;