tasks, sched/core: With a grace period after finish_task_switch(), remove unnecessary code

Remove work arounds that were written before there was a grace period
after tasks left the runqueue in finish_task_switch().

In particular now that there tasks exiting the runqueue exprience
a RCU grace period none of the work performed by task_rcu_dereference()
excpet the rcu_dereference() is necessary so replace task_rcu_dereference()
with rcu_dereference().

Remove the code in rcuwait_wait_event() that checks to ensure the current
task has not exited.  It is no longer necessary as it is guaranteed
that any running task will experience a RCU grace period after it
leaves the run queueue.

Remove the comment in rcuwait_wake_up() as it is no longer relevant.

Ref: 8f95c90ceb ("sched/wait, RCU: Introduce rcuwait machinery")
Ref: 150593bf86 ("sched/api: Introduce task_rcu_dereference() and try_get_task_struct()")
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87lfurdpk9.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Eric W. Biederman 2019-09-14 07:34:30 -05:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 0ff7b2cfba
commit 154abafc68
5 changed files with 7 additions and 87 deletions

View file

@ -234,69 +234,6 @@ repeat:
goto repeat;
}
/*
* Note that if this function returns a valid task_struct pointer (!NULL)
* task->usage must remain >0 for the duration of the RCU critical section.
*/
struct task_struct *task_rcu_dereference(struct task_struct **ptask)
{
struct sighand_struct *sighand;
struct task_struct *task;
/*
* We need to verify that release_task() was not called and thus
* delayed_put_task_struct() can't run and drop the last reference
* before rcu_read_unlock(). We check task->sighand != NULL,
* but we can read the already freed and reused memory.
*/
retry:
task = rcu_dereference(*ptask);
if (!task)
return NULL;
probe_kernel_address(&task->sighand, sighand);
/*
* Pairs with atomic_dec_and_test() in put_task_struct(). If this task
* was already freed we can not miss the preceding update of this
* pointer.
*/
smp_rmb();
if (unlikely(task != READ_ONCE(*ptask)))
goto retry;
/*
* We've re-checked that "task == *ptask", now we have two different
* cases:
*
* 1. This is actually the same task/task_struct. In this case
* sighand != NULL tells us it is still alive.
*
* 2. This is another task which got the same memory for task_struct.
* We can't know this of course, and we can not trust
* sighand != NULL.
*
* In this case we actually return a random value, but this is
* correct.
*
* If we return NULL - we can pretend that we actually noticed that
* *ptask was updated when the previous task has exited. Or pretend
* that probe_slab_address(&sighand) reads NULL.
*
* If we return the new task (because sighand is not NULL for any
* reason) - this is fine too. This (new) task can't go away before
* another gp pass.
*
* And note: We could even eliminate the false positive if re-read
* task->sighand once again to avoid the falsely NULL. But this case
* is very unlikely so we don't care.
*/
if (!sighand)
return NULL;
return task;
}
void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w)
{
struct task_struct *task;
@ -316,10 +253,6 @@ void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w)
*/
smp_mb(); /* (B) */
/*
* Avoid using task_rcu_dereference() magic as long as we are careful,
* see comment in rcuwait_wait_event() regarding ->exit_state.
*/
task = rcu_dereference(w->task);
if (task)
wake_up_process(task);