mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-07-23 07:12:09 +00:00
sparc: Kill user copy check code.
For whatever reason GCC isn't able to figure things out in the control flow (in particular when min() and max() expressions are involved) on sparc as well as it can on x86. So lots of useless incorrect user copy warnings get spewed and the full-on compile failure mode of the user copy checks were never usable on sparc at all. People can debug these kinds of problems on x86. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b11287e8c5
commit
4cb6066af9
3 changed files with 4 additions and 46 deletions
|
@ -260,23 +260,8 @@ static inline unsigned long __copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, un
|
|||
return __copy_user(to, (__force void __user *) from, n);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extern void copy_from_user_overflow(void)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
|
||||
__compiletime_error("copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct")
|
||||
#else
|
||||
__compiletime_warning("copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct")
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned long copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int sz = __compiletime_object_size(to);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(sz != -1 && sz < n)) {
|
||||
copy_from_user_overflow();
|
||||
return n;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (n && __access_ok((unsigned long) from, n))
|
||||
return __copy_user((__force void __user *) to, from, n);
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue