mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-06-28 17:41:50 +00:00
mlx4_core: fix wrong comment about the reason of subtract one from the max_cqes
The reason for the pre-allocation of one CQE is to enable resizing of the CQ. Fix comment accordingly. Signed-off-by: Dotan Barak <dotanb@dev.mellanox.co.il> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.co.il> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sokolovsky <vlad@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e684000b8a
commit
57d0f00dfe
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -514,8 +514,7 @@ static int mlx4_dev_cap(struct mlx4_dev *dev, struct mlx4_dev_cap *dev_cap)
|
|||
dev->caps.max_rq_desc_sz = dev_cap->max_rq_desc_sz;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Subtract 1 from the limit because we need to allocate a
|
||||
* spare CQE so the HCA HW can tell the difference between an
|
||||
* empty CQ and a full CQ.
|
||||
* spare CQE to enable resizing the CQ.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dev->caps.max_cqes = dev_cap->max_cq_sz - 1;
|
||||
dev->caps.reserved_cqs = dev_cap->reserved_cqs;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue