sched/isolation: Handle the nohz_full= parameter

We want to centralize the isolation management, done by the housekeeping
subsystem. Therefore we need to handle the nohz_full= parameter from
there.

Since nohz_full= so far has involved unbound timers, watchdog, RCU
and tilegx NAPI isolation, we keep that default behaviour.

nohz_full= will be deprecated in the future. We want to control
the isolation features from the isolcpus= parameter.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509072159-31808-10-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Frederic Weisbecker 2017-10-27 04:42:36 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent de201559df
commit 6f1982fedd
5 changed files with 37 additions and 24 deletions

View file

@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu);
extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void);
extern void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask);
#else
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu) { }
static inline void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { }
#endif
static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)