inode: convert inode_sb_list_lock to per-sb

The process of reducing contention on per-superblock inode lists
starts with moving the locking to match the per-superblock inode
list. This takes the global lock out of the picture and reduces the
contention problems to within a single filesystem. This doesn't get
rid of contention as the locks still have global CPU scope, but it
does isolate operations on different superblocks form each other.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dave Chinner 2015-03-04 12:37:22 -05:00 committed by Josef Bacik
parent cbedaac634
commit 74278da9f7
10 changed files with 57 additions and 54 deletions

View file

@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
* inode->i_state, inode->i_hash, __iget()
* Inode LRU list locks protect:
* inode->i_sb->s_inode_lru, inode->i_lru
* inode_sb_list_lock protects:
* sb->s_inodes, inode->i_sb_list
* inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock protects:
* inode->i_sb->s_inodes, inode->i_sb_list
* bdi->wb.list_lock protects:
* bdi->wb.b_{dirty,io,more_io,dirty_time}, inode->i_wb_list
* inode_hash_lock protects:
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
*
* Lock ordering:
*
* inode_sb_list_lock
* inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock
* inode->i_lock
* Inode LRU list locks
*
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
* inode->i_lock
*
* inode_hash_lock
* inode_sb_list_lock
* inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock
* inode->i_lock
*
* iunique_lock
@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static unsigned int i_hash_shift __read_mostly;
static struct hlist_head *inode_hashtable __read_mostly;
static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_hash_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_sb_list_lock);
/*
* Empty aops. Can be used for the cases where the user does not
* define any of the address_space operations.
@ -426,18 +424,18 @@ static void inode_lru_list_del(struct inode *inode)
*/
void inode_sb_list_add(struct inode *inode)
{
spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
list_add(&inode->i_sb_list, &inode->i_sb->s_inodes);
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inode_sb_list_add);
static inline void inode_sb_list_del(struct inode *inode)
{
if (!list_empty(&inode->i_sb_list)) {
spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
}
}
@ -594,7 +592,7 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
struct inode *inode, *next;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
continue;
@ -610,7 +608,7 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
list_add(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
}
@ -631,7 +629,7 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb, bool kill_dirty)
struct inode *inode, *next;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
@ -654,7 +652,7 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb, bool kill_dirty)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
list_add(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
@ -890,7 +888,7 @@ struct inode *new_inode(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct inode *inode;
spin_lock_prefetch(&inode_sb_list_lock);
spin_lock_prefetch(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
inode = new_inode_pseudo(sb);
if (inode)