[SCTP]: Use struct list_head for chunk lists, not sk_buff_head.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
David S. Miller 2005-07-08 21:47:49 -07:00
parent 9c05989bb2
commit 79af02c253
8 changed files with 86 additions and 66 deletions

View file

@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
/* Initialize an SCTP inqueue. */
void sctp_inq_init(struct sctp_inq *queue)
{
skb_queue_head_init(&queue->in);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->in_chunk_list);
queue->in_progress = NULL;
/* Create a task for delivering data. */
@ -62,11 +62,13 @@ void sctp_inq_init(struct sctp_inq *queue)
/* Release the memory associated with an SCTP inqueue. */
void sctp_inq_free(struct sctp_inq *queue)
{
struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
struct sctp_chunk *chunk, *tmp;
/* Empty the queue. */
while ((chunk = (struct sctp_chunk *) skb_dequeue(&queue->in)) != NULL)
list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, tmp, &queue->in_chunk_list, list) {
list_del_init(&chunk->list);
sctp_chunk_free(chunk);
}
/* If there is a packet which is currently being worked on,
* free it as well.
@ -92,7 +94,7 @@ void sctp_inq_push(struct sctp_inq *q, struct sctp_chunk *packet)
* Eventually, we should clean up inqueue to not rely
* on the BH related data structures.
*/
skb_queue_tail(&(q->in), (struct sk_buff *) packet);
list_add_tail(&packet->list, &q->in_chunk_list);
q->immediate.func(q->immediate.data);
}
@ -131,12 +133,16 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_inq_pop(struct sctp_inq *queue)
/* Do we need to take the next packet out of the queue to process? */
if (!chunk) {
struct list_head *entry;
/* Is the queue empty? */
if (skb_queue_empty(&queue->in))
if (list_empty(&queue->in_chunk_list))
return NULL;
entry = queue->in_chunk_list.next;
chunk = queue->in_progress =
(struct sctp_chunk *) skb_dequeue(&queue->in);
list_entry(entry, struct sctp_chunk, list);
list_del_init(entry);
/* This is the first chunk in the packet. */
chunk->singleton = 1;