mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-06-21 14:11:20 +00:00
mm: arch: make in_gate_area take an mm_struct instead of a task_struct
Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked with respect to an mm, not a particular task. Moreover, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make existing and future operations on mm's more flexible and convenient. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca> Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
31db58b3ab
commit
83b964bbf8
7 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -1581,10 +1581,10 @@ static inline bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page) { return true; }
|
|||
extern struct vm_area_struct *get_gate_vma(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
||||
#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA
|
||||
int in_gate_area_no_task(unsigned long addr);
|
||||
int in_gate_area(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long addr);
|
||||
int in_gate_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
int in_gate_area_no_task(unsigned long addr);
|
||||
#define in_gate_area(task, addr) ({(void)task; in_gate_area_no_task(addr);})
|
||||
#define in_gate_area(mm, addr) ({(void)mm; in_gate_area_no_task(addr);})
|
||||
#endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA */
|
||||
|
||||
int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue