mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-06-20 21:51:05 +00:00
sched/numa: Remove the numa_balancing_scan_period_reset sysctl
With scan rate adaptions based on whether the workload has properly converged or not there should be no need for the scan period reset hammer. Get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-60-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
04bb2f9475
commit
930aa174fc
6 changed files with 4 additions and 37 deletions
|
@ -370,13 +370,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
|
|||
.mode = 0644,
|
||||
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
.procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_reset",
|
||||
.data = &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset,
|
||||
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
|
||||
.mode = 0644,
|
||||
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
.procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_max_ms",
|
||||
.data = &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue