GitHub-Mirror/Star64_linux
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git synced 2025-06-23 15:11:16 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

workqueue: don't use WQ_HIGHPRI for unbound workqueues

Browse source 
Unbound wqs aren't concurrency-managed and try to execute work items
as soon as possible.  This is currently achieved by implicitly setting
%WQ_HIGHPRI on all unbound workqueues; however, WQ_HIGHPRI
implementation is about to be restructured and this usage won't be
valid anymore.

Add an explicit chain-wakeup path for unbound workqueues in
process_one_work() instead of piggy backing on %WQ_HIGHPRI.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo 2012-07-12 14:46:37 -07:00
parent 918227bb1b
commit 974271c485
1 changed files with 11 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
kernel/workqueue.c
View file

@ -580,6 +580,10 @@ static bool __need_more_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
/* /*
* Need to wake up a worker? Called from anything but currently * Need to wake up a worker? Called from anything but currently
* running workers. * running workers.
*
* Note that, because unbound workers never contribute to nr_running, this
* function will always return %true for unbound gcwq as long as the
* worklist isn't empty.
*/ */
static bool need_more_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq) static bool need_more_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
{ {
@ -1867,6 +1871,13 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
if (unlikely(cpu_intensive)) if (unlikely(cpu_intensive))
worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE, true); worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE, true);
/*
* Unbound gcwq isn't concurrency managed and work items should be
* executed ASAP. Wake up another worker if necessary.
*/
if ((worker->flags & WORKER_UNBOUND) && need_more_worker(gcwq))
wake_up_worker(gcwq);
spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock); spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
work_clear_pending(work); work_clear_pending(work);
@ -2984,13 +2995,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
if (flags & WQ_MEM_RECLAIM) if (flags & WQ_MEM_RECLAIM)
flags |= WQ_RESCUER; flags |= WQ_RESCUER;
/*
* Unbound workqueues aren't concurrency managed and should be
* dispatched to workers immediately.
*/
if (flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
flags |= WQ_HIGHPRI;
max_active = max_active ?: WQ_DFL_ACTIVE; max_active = max_active ?: WQ_DFL_ACTIVE;
max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, flags, wq->name); max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, flags, wq->name);