mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-06-25 16:11:45 +00:00
remove SWRITE* I/O types
These flags aren't real I/O types, but tell ll_rw_block to always lock the buffer instead of giving up on a failed trylock. Instead add a new write_dirty_buffer helper that implements this semantic and use it from the existing SWRITE* callers. Note that the ll_rw_block code had a bug where it didn't promote WRITE_SYNC_PLUG properly, which this patch fixes. In the ufs code clean up the helper that used to call ll_rw_block to mirror sync_dirty_buffer, which is the function it implements for compound buffers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87e99511ea
commit
9cb569d601
16 changed files with 73 additions and 94 deletions
52
fs/buffer.c
52
fs/buffer.c
|
@ -770,11 +770,12 @@ static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t *lock, struct list_head *list)
|
|||
spin_unlock(lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure any pending I/O completes so that
|
||||
* ll_rw_block() actually writes the current
|
||||
* contents - it is a noop if I/O is still in
|
||||
* flight on potentially older contents.
|
||||
* write_dirty_buffer() actually writes the
|
||||
* current contents - it is a noop if I/O is
|
||||
* still in flight on potentially older
|
||||
* contents.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ll_rw_block(SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG, 1, &bh);
|
||||
write_dirty_buffer(bh, WRITE_SYNC_PLUG);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Kick off IO for the previous mapping. Note
|
||||
|
@ -2949,22 +2950,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bh);
|
|||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* ll_rw_block: low-level access to block devices (DEPRECATED)
|
||||
* @rw: whether to %READ or %WRITE or %SWRITE or maybe %READA (readahead)
|
||||
* @rw: whether to %READ or %WRITE or maybe %READA (readahead)
|
||||
* @nr: number of &struct buffer_heads in the array
|
||||
* @bhs: array of pointers to &struct buffer_head
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ll_rw_block() takes an array of pointers to &struct buffer_heads, and
|
||||
* requests an I/O operation on them, either a %READ or a %WRITE. The third
|
||||
* %SWRITE is like %WRITE only we make sure that the *current* data in buffers
|
||||
* are sent to disk. The fourth %READA option is described in the documentation
|
||||
* for generic_make_request() which ll_rw_block() calls.
|
||||
* %READA option is described in the documentation for generic_make_request()
|
||||
* which ll_rw_block() calls.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function drops any buffer that it cannot get a lock on (with the
|
||||
* BH_Lock state bit) unless SWRITE is required, any buffer that appears to be
|
||||
* clean when doing a write request, and any buffer that appears to be
|
||||
* up-to-date when doing read request. Further it marks as clean buffers that
|
||||
* are processed for writing (the buffer cache won't assume that they are
|
||||
* actually clean until the buffer gets unlocked).
|
||||
* BH_Lock state bit), any buffer that appears to be clean when doing a write
|
||||
* request, and any buffer that appears to be up-to-date when doing read
|
||||
* request. Further it marks as clean buffers that are processed for
|
||||
* writing (the buffer cache won't assume that they are actually clean
|
||||
* until the buffer gets unlocked).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ll_rw_block sets b_end_io to simple completion handler that marks
|
||||
* the buffer up-to-date (if approriate), unlocks the buffer and wakes
|
||||
|
@ -2980,20 +2980,13 @@ void ll_rw_block(int rw, int nr, struct buffer_head *bhs[])
|
|||
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
|
||||
struct buffer_head *bh = bhs[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (rw == SWRITE || rw == SWRITE_SYNC || rw == SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG)
|
||||
lock_buffer(bh);
|
||||
else if (!trylock_buffer(bh))
|
||||
if (!trylock_buffer(bh))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (rw == WRITE || rw == SWRITE || rw == SWRITE_SYNC ||
|
||||
rw == SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG) {
|
||||
if (rw == WRITE) {
|
||||
if (test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
|
||||
bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
|
||||
get_bh(bh);
|
||||
if (rw == SWRITE_SYNC)
|
||||
submit_bh(WRITE_SYNC, bh);
|
||||
else
|
||||
submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
|
||||
submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -3009,6 +3002,19 @@ void ll_rw_block(int rw, int nr, struct buffer_head *bhs[])
|
|||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ll_rw_block);
|
||||
|
||||
void write_dirty_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh, int rw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
lock_buffer(bh);
|
||||
if (!test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
|
||||
unlock_buffer(bh);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
|
||||
get_bh(bh);
|
||||
submit_bh(rw, bh);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_dirty_buffer);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For a data-integrity writeout, we need to wait upon any in-progress I/O
|
||||
* and then start new I/O and then wait upon it. The caller must have a ref on
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue