clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner 2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View file

@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static void irqsoff_print_header(struct seq_file *s)
/*
* Should this new latency be reported/recorded?
*/
static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, u64 delta)
{
if (tracing_thresh) {
if (delta < tracing_thresh)
@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ check_critical_timing(struct trace_array *tr,
unsigned long parent_ip,
int cpu)
{
cycle_t T0, T1, delta;
u64 T0, T1, delta;
unsigned long flags;
int pc;