[NET]: Introduce SO_{SND,RCV}BUFFORCE socket options

Allows overriding of sysctl_{wmem,rmrm}_max

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Patrick McHardy 2005-08-09 19:30:51 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent f9e815b376
commit b0573dea1f
22 changed files with 58 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
if (val > sysctl_wmem_max)
val = sysctl_wmem_max;
set_sndbuf:
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
if ((val * 2) < SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF)
sk->sk_sndbuf = SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF;
@ -274,6 +274,13 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
sk->sk_write_space(sk);
break;
case SO_SNDBUFFORCE:
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
ret = -EPERM;
break;
}
goto set_sndbuf;
case SO_RCVBUF:
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
@ -282,7 +289,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
if (val > sysctl_rmem_max)
val = sysctl_rmem_max;
set_rcvbuf:
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
/* FIXME: is this lower bound the right one? */
if ((val * 2) < SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF)
@ -291,6 +298,13 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
sk->sk_rcvbuf = val * 2;
break;
case SO_RCVBUFFORCE:
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
ret = -EPERM;
break;
}
goto set_rcvbuf;
case SO_KEEPALIVE:
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)