mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-07-23 15:27:29 +00:00
sh: ftrace: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack
The structure of the ret_stack array on the task struct is going to change, and accessing it directly via the curr_ret_stack index will no longer give the ret_stack entry that holds the return address. To access that, architectures must now use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() to get the associated ret_stack that matches the saved return address. Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
945626db09
commit
cec8d0e7f0
2 changed files with 12 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -608,17 +608,18 @@ struct dwarf_frame *dwarf_unwind_stack(unsigned long pc,
|
|||
* expected to find the real return address.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pc == (unsigned long)&return_to_handler) {
|
||||
int index = current->curr_ret_stack;
|
||||
struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
|
||||
|
||||
ret_stack = ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(current, 0);
|
||||
if (ret_stack)
|
||||
pc = ret_stack->ret;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We currently have no way of tracking how many
|
||||
* return_to_handler()'s we've seen. If there is more
|
||||
* than one patched return address on our stack,
|
||||
* complain loudly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
WARN_ON(index > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
pc = current->ret_stack[index].ret;
|
||||
WARN_ON(ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(current, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue