mm: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) instead of NUMA_BUILD

We don't need custom NUMA_BUILD anymore, since we have handy
IS_ENABLED().

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kirill A. Shutemov 2012-12-11 16:00:29 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 19965460e3
commit e5adfffc85
4 changed files with 13 additions and 18 deletions

View file

@ -2550,7 +2550,7 @@ static void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v)
{
if (NUMA_BUILD) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) {
unsigned int nr, *counters = m->private;
if (!counters)
@ -2615,7 +2615,7 @@ static int vmalloc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
unsigned int *ptr = NULL;
int ret;
if (NUMA_BUILD) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) {
ptr = kmalloc(nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
if (ptr == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;