mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/Star64_linux.git
synced 2025-03-30 11:04:25 +00:00
tcp: refine tcp_write_queue_empty() implementation
Due to how tcp_sendmsg() is implemented, we can have an empty skb at the tail of the write queue. Most [1] tcp_write_queue_empty() callers want to know if there is anything to send (payload and/or FIN) Instead of checking if the sk_write_queue is empty, we need to test if tp->write_seq == tp->snd_nxt [1] tcp_send_fin() was the only caller that expected to see if an skb was in the write queue, I have changed the code to reuse the tcp_write_queue_tail() result. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f85e6267c
commit
ee2aabd3fc
2 changed files with 13 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1766,9 +1766,18 @@ static inline bool tcp_skb_is_last(const struct sock *sk,
|
||||||
return skb_queue_is_last(&sk->sk_write_queue, skb);
|
return skb_queue_is_last(&sk->sk_write_queue, skb);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* tcp_write_queue_empty - test if any payload (or FIN) is available in write queue
|
||||||
|
* @sk: socket
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Since the write queue can have a temporary empty skb in it,
|
||||||
|
* we must not use "return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_write_queue)"
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
static inline bool tcp_write_queue_empty(const struct sock *sk)
|
static inline bool tcp_write_queue_empty(const struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_write_queue);
|
const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return tp->write_seq == tp->snd_nxt;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline bool tcp_rtx_queue_empty(const struct sock *sk)
|
static inline bool tcp_rtx_queue_empty(const struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -3129,7 +3129,7 @@ void sk_forced_mem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
|
void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct sk_buff *skb, *tskb = tcp_write_queue_tail(sk);
|
struct sk_buff *skb, *tskb, *tail = tcp_write_queue_tail(sk);
|
||||||
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
|
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Optimization, tack on the FIN if we have one skb in write queue and
|
/* Optimization, tack on the FIN if we have one skb in write queue and
|
||||||
|
@ -3137,6 +3137,7 @@ void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
* Note: in the latter case, FIN packet will be sent after a timeout,
|
* Note: in the latter case, FIN packet will be sent after a timeout,
|
||||||
* as TCP stack thinks it has already been transmitted.
|
* as TCP stack thinks it has already been transmitted.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
tskb = tail;
|
||||||
if (!tskb && tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))
|
if (!tskb && tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))
|
||||||
tskb = skb_rb_last(&sk->tcp_rtx_queue);
|
tskb = skb_rb_last(&sk->tcp_rtx_queue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -3144,7 +3145,7 @@ void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
TCP_SKB_CB(tskb)->tcp_flags |= TCPHDR_FIN;
|
TCP_SKB_CB(tskb)->tcp_flags |= TCPHDR_FIN;
|
||||||
TCP_SKB_CB(tskb)->end_seq++;
|
TCP_SKB_CB(tskb)->end_seq++;
|
||||||
tp->write_seq++;
|
tp->write_seq++;
|
||||||
if (tcp_write_queue_empty(sk)) {
|
if (!tail) {
|
||||||
/* This means tskb was already sent.
|
/* This means tskb was already sent.
|
||||||
* Pretend we included the FIN on previous transmit.
|
* Pretend we included the FIN on previous transmit.
|
||||||
* We need to set tp->snd_nxt to the value it would have
|
* We need to set tp->snd_nxt to the value it would have
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue