Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull scheduler updates from Thomas Gleixner:

 - Cleanup and improvement of NUMA balancing

 - Refactoring and improvements to the PELT (Per Entity Load Tracking)
   code

 - Watchdog simplification and related cleanups

 - The usual pile of small incremental fixes and improvements

* 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits)
  watchdog: Reduce message verbosity
  stop_machine: Reflow cpu_stop_queue_two_works()
  sched/numa: Move task_numa_placement() closer to numa_migrate_preferred()
  sched/numa: Use group_weights to identify if migration degrades locality
  sched/numa: Update the scan period without holding the numa_group lock
  sched/numa: Remove numa_has_capacity()
  sched/numa: Modify migrate_swap() to accept additional parameters
  sched/numa: Remove unused task_capacity from 'struct numa_stats'
  sched/numa: Skip nodes that are at 'hoplimit'
  sched/debug: Reverse the order of printing faults
  sched/numa: Use task faults only if numa_group is not yet set up
  sched/numa: Set preferred_node based on best_cpu
  sched/numa: Simplify load_too_imbalanced()
  sched/numa: Evaluate move once per node
  sched/numa: Remove redundant field
  sched/debug: Show the sum wait time of a task group
  sched/fair: Remove #ifdefs from scale_rt_capacity()
  sched/core: Remove get_cpu() from sched_fork()
  sched/cpufreq: Clarify sugov_get_util()
  sched/sysctl: Remove unused sched_time_avg_ms sysctl
  ...
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2018-08-13 11:25:07 -07:00
commit f7951c33f0
38 changed files with 1015 additions and 876 deletions

View file

@ -238,13 +238,24 @@ static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
struct cpu_stopper *stopper2 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu2);
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wakeq);
int err;
retry:
/*
* The waking up of stopper threads has to happen in the same
* scheduling context as the queueing. Otherwise, there is a
* possibility of one of the above stoppers being woken up by another
* CPU, and preempting us. This will cause us to not wake up the other
* stopper forever.
*/
preempt_disable();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
raw_spin_lock_nested(&stopper2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
err = -ENOENT;
if (!stopper1->enabled || !stopper2->enabled)
if (!stopper1->enabled || !stopper2->enabled) {
err = -ENOENT;
goto unlock;
}
/*
* Ensure that if we race with __stop_cpus() the stoppers won't get
* queued up in reverse order leading to system deadlock.
@ -255,36 +266,30 @@ retry:
* It can be falsely true but it is safe to spin until it is cleared,
* queue_stop_cpus_work() does everything under preempt_disable().
*/
err = -EDEADLK;
if (unlikely(stop_cpus_in_progress))
goto unlock;
if (unlikely(stop_cpus_in_progress)) {
err = -EDEADLK;
goto unlock;
}
err = 0;
__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1, &wakeq);
__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2, &wakeq);
/*
* The waking up of stopper threads has to happen
* in the same scheduling context as the queueing.
* Otherwise, there is a possibility of one of the
* above stoppers being woken up by another CPU,
* and preempting us. This will cause us to n ot
* wake up the other stopper forever.
*/
preempt_disable();
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&stopper2->lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
if (unlikely(err == -EDEADLK)) {
preempt_enable();
while (stop_cpus_in_progress)
cpu_relax();
goto retry;
}
if (!err) {
wake_up_q(&wakeq);
preempt_enable();
}
wake_up_q(&wakeq);
preempt_enable();
return err;
}