This is the sync up with the canonical definitions of the input,
sound and display protocols in Xen.
Changes to kbdif:
1. Add missing string constants for {feature|request}-raw-pointer
to align with the rest of the interface file.
2. Add new XenStore feature fields, so it is possible to individually
control set of exposed virtual devices for each guest OS:
- set feature-disable-keyboard to 1 if no keyboard device needs
to be created
- set feature-disable-pointer to 1 if no pointer device needs
to be created
3. Move multi-touch device parameters to backend nodes: these are
described as a part of frontend's XenBus configuration nodes
while they belong to backend's configuration. Fix this by moving
the parameters to the proper section.
Unique-id field:
1. Add unique-id XenBus entry for virtual input and display.
2. Change type of unique-id field to string for sndif to align with
display and input protocols.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized
display driver.
This protocol aims to provide a unified protocol which fits more
sophisticated use-cases than a framebuffer device can handle. At the
moment basic functionality is supported with the intention to extend:
o multiple dynamically allocated/destroyed framebuffers
o buffers of arbitrary sizes
o better configuration options including multiple display support
Note: existing fbif can be used together with displif running at the
same time, e.g. on Linux one provides framebuffer and another DRM/KMS
Future extensions to the existing protocol may include:
o allow display/connector cloning
o allow allocating objects other than display buffers
o add planes/overlays support
o support scaling
o support rotation
Note, that this protocol doesn't use ring macros for
bi-directional exchange (PV calls/9pfs) bacause:
o it statically defines the use of a single page
for the ring buffer
o it uses direct memory access to ring's contents
w/o memory copying
o re-uses the same idea that kbdif/fbif use
which for this use-case seems to be appropriate
==================================================
Rationale for introducing this protocol instead of
using the existing fbif:
==================================================
1. In/out event sizes
o fbif - 40 octets
o displif - 40 octets
This is only the initial version of the displif protocol
which means that there could be requests which will not fit
(WRT introducing some GPU related functionality
later on). In that case we cannot alter fbif sizes as we need to
be backward compatible an will be forced to handle those
apart of fbif.
2. Shared page
Displif doesn't use anything like struct xenfb_page, but
DEFINE_RING_TYPES(xen_displif, struct xendispl_req, struct
xendispl_resp) which is a better and more common way.
Output events use a shared page which only has in_cons and in_prod
and all the rest is used for incoming events. Here struct xenfb_page
could probably be used as is despite the fact that it only has a half
of a page for incoming events which is only 50 events. (consider
something like 60Hz display)
3. Amount of changes.
fbif only provides XENFB_TYPE_UPDATE and XENFB_TYPE_RESIZE
events, so it looks like it is easier to get fb support into displif
than vice versa. displif at the moment has 6 requests and 1 event,
multiple connector support, etc.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Grytsov <oleksandr_grytsov@epam.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
