netlink: make nlmsg_end() and genlmsg_end() void

Contrary to common expectations for an "int" return, these functions
return only a positive value -- if used correctly they cannot even
return 0 because the message header will necessarily be in the skb.

This makes the very common pattern of

  if (genlmsg_end(...) < 0) { ... }

be a whole bunch of dead code. Many places also simply do

  return nlmsg_end(...);

and the caller is expected to deal with it.

This also commonly (at least for me) causes errors, because it is very
common to write

  if (my_function(...))
    /* error condition */

and if my_function() does "return nlmsg_end()" this is of course wrong.

Additionally, there's not a single place in the kernel that actually
needs the message length returned, and if anyone needs it later then
it'll be very easy to just use skb->len there.

Remove this, and make the functions void. This removes a bunch of dead
code as described above. The patch adds lines because I did

-	return nlmsg_end(...);
+	nlmsg_end(...);
+	return 0;

I could have preserved all the function's return values by returning
skb->len, but instead I've audited all the places calling the affected
functions and found that none cared. A few places actually compared
the return value with <= 0 in dump functionality, but that could just
be changed to < 0 with no change in behaviour, so I opted for the more
efficient version.

One instance of the error I've made numerous times now is also present
in net/phonet/pn_netlink.c in the route_dumpit() function - it didn't
check for <0 or <=0 and thus broke out of the loop every single time.
I've preserved this since it will (I think) have caused the messages to
userspace to be formatted differently with just a single message for
every SKB returned to userspace. It's possible that this isn't needed
for the tools that actually use this, but I don't even know what they
are so couldn't test that changing this behaviour would be acceptable.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

kernel/taskstats.c

@@ -111,13 +111,8 @@ static int send_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
 	struct genlmsghdr *genlhdr = nlmsg_data(nlmsg_hdr(skb));
 	void *reply = genlmsg_data(genlhdr);
-	int rc;
 
-	rc = genlmsg_end(skb, reply);
-	if (rc < 0) {
-		nlmsg_free(skb);
-		return rc;
-	}
+	genlmsg_end(skb, reply);
 
 	return genlmsg_reply(skb, info);
 }
@@ -134,11 +129,7 @@ static void send_cpu_listeners(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	void *reply = genlmsg_data(genlhdr);
 	int rc, delcount = 0;
 
-	rc = genlmsg_end(skb, reply);
-	if (rc < 0) {
-		nlmsg_free(skb);
-		return;
-	}
+	genlmsg_end(skb, reply);
 
 	rc = 0;
 	down_read(&listeners->sem);