mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/linux-bl808.git
synced 2025-06-17 20:25:19 +00:00
fanotify: use notification_lock instead of access_lock
Fanotify code has its own lock (access_lock) to protect a list of events waiting for a response from userspace. However this is somewhat awkward as the same list_head in the event is protected by notification_lock if it is part of the notification queue and by access_lock if it is part of the fanotify private queue which makes it difficult for any reliable checks in the generic code. So make fanotify use the same lock - notification_lock - for protecting its private event list. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-6-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c21dbe20f6
commit
073f65522a
2 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct fsnotify_group {
|
|||
struct fanotify_group_private_data {
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
|
||||
/* allows a group to block waiting for a userspace response */
|
||||
spinlock_t access_lock;
|
||||
struct list_head access_list;
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t access_waitq;
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue