mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/linux-bl808.git
synced 2025-06-17 20:25:19 +00:00
net: use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in poll() handlers
Many poll() handlers are lockless. Using skb_queue_empty_lockless() instead of skb_queue_empty() is more appropriate. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
137a0dbe34
commit
3ef7cf57c7
14 changed files with 22 additions and 22 deletions
|
@ -8476,7 +8476,7 @@ __poll_t sctp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
|
|||
mask = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is there any exceptional events? */
|
||||
if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_error_queue))
|
||||
if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_error_queue))
|
||||
mask |= EPOLLERR |
|
||||
(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE) ? EPOLLPRI : 0);
|
||||
if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
|
||||
|
@ -8485,7 +8485,7 @@ __poll_t sctp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
|
|||
mask |= EPOLLHUP;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is it readable? Reconsider this code with TCP-style support. */
|
||||
if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
|
||||
if (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
|
||||
mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
|
||||
|
||||
/* The association is either gone or not ready. */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue