GitHub-Mirror/linux-bl808
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Fishwaldo/linux-bl808.git synced 2025-06-17 20:25:19 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

Browse source 
The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stratos Karafotis 2016-11-16 21:27:22 +02:00 • committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 00bfe05889
commit 42d951c851
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
View file

@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
* sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80% * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
* (default), then we try to decrease frequency * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
* *
* Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
* happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency * frequency
*/ */
static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{ {