mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/linux-bl808.git
synced 2025-06-17 20:25:19 +00:00
mm, compaction: raise compaction priority after it withdrawns
Mike Kravetz reports that "hugetlb allocations could stall for minutes or hours when should_compact_retry() would return true more often then it should. Specifically, this was in the case where compact_result was COMPACT_DEFERRED and COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED and no progress was being made." The problem is that the compaction_withdrawn() test in should_compact_retry() includes compaction outcomes that are only possible on low compaction priority, and results in a retry without increasing the priority. This may result in furter reclaim, and more incomplete compaction attempts. With this patch, compaction priority is raised when possible, or should_compact_retry() returns false. The COMPACT_SKIPPED result doesn't really fit together with the other outcomes in compaction_withdrawn(), as that's a result caused by insufficient order-0 pages, not due to low compaction priority. With this patch, it is moved to a new compaction_needs_reclaim() function, and for that outcome we keep the current logic of retrying if it looks like reclaim will be able to help. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190806014744.15446-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Reported-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Tested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ee04716c4
commit
4943308556
2 changed files with 30 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -129,11 +129,8 @@ static inline bool compaction_failed(enum compact_result result)
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Compaction has backed off for some reason. It might be throttling or
|
||||
* lock contention. Retrying is still worthwhile.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool compaction_withdrawn(enum compact_result result)
|
||||
/* Compaction needs reclaim to be performed first, so it can continue. */
|
||||
static inline bool compaction_needs_reclaim(enum compact_result result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Compaction backed off due to watermark checks for order-0
|
||||
|
@ -142,6 +139,16 @@ static inline bool compaction_withdrawn(enum compact_result result)
|
|||
if (result == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Compaction has backed off for some reason after doing some work or none
|
||||
* at all. It might be throttling or lock contention. Retrying might be still
|
||||
* worthwhile, but with a higher priority if allowed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool compaction_withdrawn(enum compact_result result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If compaction is deferred for high-order allocations, it is
|
||||
* because sync compaction recently failed. If this is the case
|
||||
|
@ -207,6 +214,11 @@ static inline bool compaction_failed(enum compact_result result)
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool compaction_needs_reclaim(enum compact_result result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool compaction_withdrawn(enum compact_result result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue