[PATCH] fix next_timer_interrupt() for hrtimer

Also from Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Function next_timer_interrupt() got broken with a recent patch
6ba1b91213 as sys_nanosleep() was moved to
hrtimer.  This broke things as next_timer_interrupt() did not check hrtimer
tree for next event.

Function next_timer_interrupt() is needed with dyntick (CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ,
VST) implementations, as the system can be in idle when next hrtimer event
was supposed to happen.  At least ARM and S390 currently use
next_timer_interrupt().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tony Lindgren 2006-03-06 15:42:45 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent f7c09bd972
commit 69239749e1
4 changed files with 61 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -489,9 +489,21 @@ unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(void)
struct list_head *list;
struct timer_list *nte;
unsigned long expires;
unsigned long hr_expires = MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET;
ktime_t hr_delta;
tvec_t *varray[4];
int i, j;
hr_delta = hrtimer_get_next_event();
if (hr_delta.tv64 != KTIME_MAX) {
struct timespec tsdelta;
tsdelta = ktime_to_timespec(hr_delta);
hr_expires = timespec_to_jiffies(&tsdelta);
if (hr_expires < 3)
return hr_expires + jiffies;
}
hr_expires += jiffies;
base = &__get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
spin_lock(&base->t_base.lock);
expires = base->timer_jiffies + (LONG_MAX >> 1);
@ -542,6 +554,10 @@ found:
}
}
spin_unlock(&base->t_base.lock);
if (time_before(hr_expires, expires))
return hr_expires;
return expires;
}
#endif