NFS: Remove nfs_readpage_sync()

It makes no sense to maintain 2 parallel systems for reading in pages.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trond Myklebust 2006-12-13 15:23:44 -05:00
parent c228fd3aee
commit 8e0969f045
5 changed files with 2 additions and 197 deletions

View file

@ -1734,44 +1734,6 @@ static int nfs4_proc_readlink(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
return err;
}
static int _nfs4_proc_read(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
{
int flags = rdata->flags;
struct inode *inode = rdata->inode;
struct nfs_fattr *fattr = rdata->res.fattr;
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
struct rpc_message msg = {
.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ],
.rpc_argp = &rdata->args,
.rpc_resp = &rdata->res,
.rpc_cred = rdata->cred,
};
unsigned long timestamp = jiffies;
int status;
dprintk("NFS call read %d @ %Ld\n", rdata->args.count,
(long long) rdata->args.offset);
nfs_fattr_init(fattr);
status = rpc_call_sync(server->client, &msg, flags);
if (!status)
renew_lease(server, timestamp);
dprintk("NFS reply read: %d\n", status);
return status;
}
static int nfs4_proc_read(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
{
struct nfs4_exception exception = { };
int err;
do {
err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(rdata->inode),
_nfs4_proc_read(rdata),
&exception);
} while (exception.retry);
return err;
}
/*
* Got race?
* We will need to arrange for the VFS layer to provide an atomic open.
@ -3643,7 +3605,6 @@ const struct nfs_rpc_ops nfs_v4_clientops = {
.lookup = nfs4_proc_lookup,
.access = nfs4_proc_access,
.readlink = nfs4_proc_readlink,
.read = nfs4_proc_read,
.create = nfs4_proc_create,
.remove = nfs4_proc_remove,
.unlink_setup = nfs4_proc_unlink_setup,