GitHub-Mirror/linux-bl808
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Fishwaldo/linux-bl808.git synced 2025-06-17 20:25:19 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

NFS: Remove nfs_readpage_sync()

Browse source 
It makes no sense to maintain 2 parallel systems for reading in pages.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trond Myklebust 2006-12-13 15:23:44 -05:00
parent c228fd3aee
commit 8e0969f045
5 changed files with 2 additions and 197 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

30
fs/nfs/proc.c
View file

@ -186,35 +186,6 @@ static int nfs_proc_readlink(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
return status;
}
static int nfs_proc_read(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
{
int flags = rdata->flags;
struct inode * inode = rdata->inode;
struct nfs_fattr * fattr = rdata->res.fattr;
struct rpc_message msg = {
.rpc_proc = &nfs_procedures[NFSPROC_READ],
.rpc_argp = &rdata->args,
.rpc_resp = &rdata->res,
.rpc_cred = rdata->cred,
};
int status;
dprintk("NFS call read %d @ %Ld\n", rdata->args.count,
(long long) rdata->args.offset);
nfs_fattr_init(fattr);
status = rpc_call_sync(NFS_CLIENT(inode), &msg, flags);
if (status >= 0) {
nfs_refresh_inode(inode, fattr);
/* Emulate the eof flag, which isn't normally needed in NFSv2
* as it is guaranteed to always return the file attributes
*/
if (rdata->args.offset + rdata->args.count >= fattr->size)
rdata->res.eof = 1;
}
dprintk("NFS reply read: %d\n", status);
return status;
}
static int
nfs_proc_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *sattr,
int flags, struct nameidata *nd)
@ -666,7 +637,6 @@ const struct nfs_rpc_ops nfs_v2_clientops = {
.lookup = nfs_proc_lookup,
.access = NULL, /* access */
.readlink = nfs_proc_readlink,
.read = nfs_proc_read,
.create = nfs_proc_create,
.remove = nfs_proc_remove,
.unlink_setup = nfs_proc_unlink_setup,