s390: stack address vs thread_info

Avoid using the address of a process' thread_info structure as the
kernel stack address. This will break as soon as the thread_info
structure will be removed from the stack, and in addition it makes the
code a bit more understandable.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Heiko Carstens 2016-06-27 07:57:21 +02:00 committed by Martin Schwidefsky
parent 43799597dc
commit c3bdf2e11a
2 changed files with 6 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -78,14 +78,10 @@ void dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data, struct task_struct *task,
sp = __dump_trace(func, data, sp,
S390_lowcore.async_stack + frame_size - ASYNC_SIZE,
S390_lowcore.async_stack + frame_size);
if (task)
__dump_trace(func, data, sp,
(unsigned long)task_stack_page(task),
(unsigned long)task_stack_page(task) + THREAD_SIZE);
else
__dump_trace(func, data, sp,
S390_lowcore.thread_info,
S390_lowcore.thread_info + THREAD_SIZE);
task = task ?: current;
__dump_trace(func, data, sp,
(unsigned long)task_stack_page(task),
(unsigned long)task_stack_page(task) + THREAD_SIZE);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dump_trace);