mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/linux-bl808.git
synced 2025-06-17 20:25:19 +00:00
In theory, compilers should be able to work this out themselves so we can use a simpler version based on the swab() helpers. I have verified that this works on all supported compiler versions (gcc-4.9 and up, clang-10 and up). Looking at the object code produced by gcc-11, I found that the impact is mostly a change in inlining decisions that lead to slightly larger code. In other cases, this version produces explicit byte swaps in place of separate byte access, or comparing against pre-swapped constants. While the source code is clearly simpler, I have not seen an indication of the new version actually producing better code on Arm, so maybe we want to skip this after all. From what I can tell, gcc recognizes the byteswap pattern in the byteshift.h header and can turn it into explicit instructions, but it does not turn a __builtin_bswap32() back into individual bytes when that would result in better output, e.g. when storing a byte-reversed constant. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
25 lines
760 B
C
25 lines
760 B
C
#ifndef __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
|
|
#define __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We generally want to set CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS on ARMv6+,
|
|
* but we don't want to use linux/unaligned/access_ok.h since that can lead
|
|
* to traps on unaligned stm/ldm or strd/ldrd.
|
|
*/
|
|
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
|
|
|
|
#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
|
|
# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
|
|
# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
|
|
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
|
|
# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
|
|
#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
|
|
# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
|
|
# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
|
|
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be
|
|
# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_be
|
|
#else
|
|
# error need to define endianess
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#endif /* __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H */
|