Liu Bo 73beece9ca Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace ... Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning, [ 1226.649039] ========================================================= [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted [ 1226.649039] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock: [ 1226.652955] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1226.652955] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1226.652955] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1226.652955] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1226.652955] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1226.652955] ---- ---- [ 1226.652955] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1226.652955] local_irq_disable(); [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1226.652955] <Interrupt> [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] *** DEADLOCK *** Commit 084b6e7c76 ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still run to this. The above lock chain comes from btrfs_commit_transaction ->btrfs_run_delayed_items ... ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode ... ->__btrfs_cow_block ... ->find_free_extent ->cache_block_group ->load_free_space_cache ->btrfs_readpages ->submit_one_bio ... ->__btrfs_map_block ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes to [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700 delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads to a ABBA deadlock. To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock. With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>		2016-02-23 13:10:10 +01:00
..
9p
adfs
affs
afs
autofs4
befs
bfs
btrfs	Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace	2016-02-23 13:10:10 +01:00
cachefiles
ceph
cifs
coda
configfs
cramfs
debugfs
devpts
dlm
ecryptfs
efivarfs
efs
exofs
exportfs
ext2
ext4
f2fs
fat
freevxfs
fscache
fuse
gfs2
hfs
hfsplus
hostfs
hpfs
hugetlbfs
isofs
jbd2
jffs2
jfs
kernfs
lockd
logfs
minix
ncpfs
nfs
nfs_common
nfsd
nilfs2
nls
notify
ntfs
ocfs2
omfs
openpromfs
overlayfs
proc
pstore
qnx4
qnx6
quota
ramfs
reiserfs
romfs
squashfs
sysfs
sysv
tracefs
ubifs
udf
ufs
xfs
aio.c
anon_inodes.c
attr.c
bad_inode.c
binfmt_aout.c
binfmt_elf.c
binfmt_elf_fdpic.c
binfmt_em86.c
binfmt_flat.c
binfmt_misc.c
binfmt_script.c
block_dev.c
buffer.c
char_dev.c
compat.c
compat_binfmt_elf.c
compat_ioctl.c
coredump.c
dax.c
dcache.c
dcookies.c
direct-io.c
drop_caches.c
eventfd.c
eventpoll.c
exec.c
fcntl.c
fhandle.c
file.c
file_table.c
filesystems.c
fs-writeback.c
fs_pin.c
fs_struct.c
inode.c
internal.h
ioctl.c
Kconfig
Kconfig.binfmt
libfs.c
locks.c
Makefile
mbcache.c
mount.h
mpage.c
namei.c
namespace.c
no-block.c
nsfs.c
open.c
pipe.c
pnode.c
pnode.h
posix_acl.c
proc_namespace.c
read_write.c
readdir.c
select.c
seq_file.c
signalfd.c
splice.c
stack.c
stat.c
statfs.c
super.c
sync.c
timerfd.c
userfaultfd.c
utimes.c
xattr.c