mirror of
https://github.com/Fishwaldo/u-boot.git
synced 2025-06-24 07:32:01 +00:00
Revert "fs: btrfs: fix false negatives in ROOT_ITEM search"
Per Pierre this change shouldn't have been applied as it was superseded by "fs: btrfs: fix btrfs_search_tree invalid results" which is also applied now as1627e5e598
. This reverts commit633967f981
. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b8e57338f
commit
6aebc0d11a
1 changed files with 6 additions and 38 deletions
|
@ -292,52 +292,20 @@ btrfs_search_tree_key_type(const struct btrfs_root *root, u64 objectid,
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct btrfs_key key, *res;
|
struct btrfs_key key, *res;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* In some cases (e.g. tree roots), we need to look for a given
|
|
||||||
* objectid and type without knowing the offset value (3rd element of a
|
|
||||||
* btrfs tree node key). We can rely on the fact that btrfs_search_tree
|
|
||||||
* returns the first element with key >= search_key, and then perform
|
|
||||||
* our own comparison between the returned element and the search key.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* It is tempting to use a search key with offset 0 to perform this
|
|
||||||
* "fuzzy search". This would return the first item with the (objectid,
|
|
||||||
* type) we're looking for. However, using offset 0 has the wrong
|
|
||||||
* behavior when the wanted item is the first in a leaf: since our
|
|
||||||
* search key will be lower than the wanted item, the recursive search
|
|
||||||
* will explore the wrong branch of the tree.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* Instead, use the largest possible offset (-1). The result of this
|
|
||||||
* search will either be:
|
|
||||||
* 1. An element with the (objectid, type) we're looking for, if it
|
|
||||||
* has offset -1 or if it is the last element in its leaf.
|
|
||||||
* 2. The first element *after* an element with the (objectid, type)
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
key.objectid = objectid;
|
key.objectid = objectid;
|
||||||
key.type = type;
|
key.type = type;
|
||||||
key.offset = -1;
|
key.offset = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (btrfs_search_tree(root, &key, path))
|
if (btrfs_search_tree(root, &key, path))
|
||||||
return NULL;
|
return NULL;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
res = btrfs_path_leaf_key(path);
|
||||||
* Compare with the previous element first -- this is the likely case
|
if (btrfs_comp_keys_type(&key, res)) {
|
||||||
* since the result of the search is only what we want if it had offset
|
btrfs_free_path(path);
|
||||||
* == -1 or if it was last in its leaf.
|
return NULL;
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (path->slots[0] > 0) {
|
|
||||||
path->slots[0]--;
|
|
||||||
res = btrfs_path_leaf_key(path);
|
|
||||||
if (!btrfs_comp_keys_type(&key, res))
|
|
||||||
return res;
|
|
||||||
path->slots[0]++;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
res = btrfs_path_leaf_key(path);
|
return res;
|
||||||
if (!btrfs_comp_keys_type(&key, res))
|
|
||||||
return res;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
btrfs_free_path(path);
|
|
||||||
return NULL;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline u32 btrfs_path_item_size(struct btrfs_path *p)
|
static inline u32 btrfs_path_item_size(struct btrfs_path *p)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue